What is optimum AFR for peak power using LPG?
Re: What is optimum AFR for peak power using LPG?
If you're finding a rich mixture gives a lot more power (and you need that power) it seems you'd either need to ditch the 175 closed loop setup or experiment with a wideband to narrowband interface as per Rob's info in post #16... Or fit a V8 in place of the 2&1/4.
Full time LPG installer
Servicing / Diagnostics / Repairs to all systems / DIY conversion kits supplied with thorough tech support
Mid Yorkshire
2 miles A1, 8 miles M62,
http://www.Lpgc.co.uk
Twitter https://twitter.com/AutogasSimon
07816237240
Servicing / Diagnostics / Repairs to all systems / DIY conversion kits supplied with thorough tech support
Mid Yorkshire
2 miles A1, 8 miles M62,
http://www.Lpgc.co.uk
Twitter https://twitter.com/AutogasSimon
07816237240
Re: What is optimum AFR for peak power using LPG?
Thinking about this and the options that are available in the Leo, it might be possible to do it. If you can frig your TPS to give maximum at foot to the floor, you can then use the full throttle option to set the actuator opening at a richer than default opening. It won't be relevant to revs but to throttle position.
96 Saab 900XS, AEB Leo, sold
93 Range Rover 4.2LSE, Lovato LovEco, sold
97 Range Rover 4.0SE, multipoint, sold
98 Ex-Police Range Rover 4.0, AEB Leo, daily motor
96 Range Rover 4.6HSE Ascot, AEB Leo, my spare
Proud member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club.
93 Range Rover 4.2LSE, Lovato LovEco, sold
97 Range Rover 4.0SE, multipoint, sold
98 Ex-Police Range Rover 4.0, AEB Leo, daily motor
96 Range Rover 4.6HSE Ascot, AEB Leo, my spare
Proud member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club.
Re: What is optimum AFR for peak power using LPG?
Thanks to you both, I've come to the conclusion it'd be a fair faff - with trade-offs such that there's no guarantee of real-world gains for the effort. I like it, currently it works well, I'm up on the deal. I'll leave 'as is'.