The figures I suggested were solely rpm based but the rpm table is really a rpm x load table with 13 rows of rpm and 26 columns of pinj, so it is possible to set 338 individual adjustments for combinations of rpm x load.
Instead of using rpm correction to make fuelling correct it is a better idea to get the shape of the multiplier correct (to have fuelling as correct as possible without rpm correction). As injector pulse frequency increases the pulse length normally needs increasing for the injector to deliver the same amount of fuel for a given pulse length compared to lower rpms, which is why I suggested the rpm compensation figures I did. They won't be absolutely correct but will be a good approximation of near correct rpm (injector pulse frequency) compensation.
The learned (ISA2 automatically entered) figures in your screenshot suggest that the shape of the multiplier map isn't quite correct because the figures are all positive, they suggest that if the multiplier is increased the figures in rpm correction could be lower.
If I were calibrating this from scratch I'd use the maximum number of user settable multiplier points allowed (10 points I defined) and I'd start by setting those points at 1.5ms, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0 and 16.0, (the points at 0ms and 26ms are always present). You can add the extra points by right clicking on screen or delete a point by selecting it and pressing delete. With the info you've provided I'd suggest starting with a multiplier map that looks like the one I've posted below and setting the rpm correction back to how I advised. You could leave ISA2 enabled to see how it changes rpm correction figures with the new multiplier map... Also remember that if your petrol map was collected (blue petrol dots and line) when you had the lambda probe issues the blue points and line will be incorrect in which case you should click on 'delete petrol map' and drive around on petrol for a while until the petrol map is collected again - only then switch to gas and see how the dots/lines/rpm correction figures compare.
I don't remember whether your engine has a mechanical fuel return (petrol pressure regulator on the fuel rail with a pressure bleed pipe running back to the petrol tank)? If it doesn't have a petrol pressure regulator on the fuel rail I will suggest entering some different figures in rpm correction and a different shape map.
If you drive the car flat out on petrol what is the highest pinj figure you see? Maybe ideally the install could benefit from some quicker injectors or bigger nozzle size and lower pressure but depending on some of the answers if you keep with the current injectors (you can't change their speed or increase because speed is due to the design of them and you can't increase nozzle size because the V30s have a 2.5mm internal restriction) the install might benefit from increasing pressure... Yet to be confirmed anyway. Speed of injectors (how quick to open) mostly affects the shape of the multiplier chart at low pinj's (this mostly affects where the peak point of the chart is, quicker injectors move the peak in the map shape to the left), nozzle size affects multiplier more than pressure at low pinj points but pressure does affect low pinj points, combination of nozzle size and pressure affects the whole map. If injectors are too slow or nozzle size isn't big enough the multiplier at low pinj's can be excessive and this can be a negative for accuracy of fuelling particularly when accounting for temperature and pressure differences. By changing aspects such as make/type of injectors, nozzle size, pressure (and by compensating by for any differences in petrol pressure when engine load changes if a mechanical fuel return isn't fitted) we can manipulate the overall slope (mult/gamma) of the map (difference of mutliplier between peak point and lowest point), the 'lead in' (upward slope of the map at very low loads), the shape of the curve of the map and overall height (average multiplier) of the map.