Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

Post Reply
Message
Author
Freebird
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:12 pm

Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#1 Post by Freebird »

Hi

I am wondering what sort of LPG consumption is reasonable to expect from one of these? I have had so much trouble with the LPG on my ZT-T lately that I'm thinking of chopping it in.

I do mostly dual carraige way stuff plus a bit of b roads for work 80 miles per day and used to get circa 23MPG from the MG on gas.

Ta

Glen.

classicswede
Installer
Posts: 2570
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:56 pm
Location: North Wales
Contact:

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#2 Post by classicswede »

Most of the P38 4.6 and 4.0 that I have converted do between 16 and 18MPG with the auto box. A manual so be getting 20+
http://www.classicswede.co.uk/LPG/cat17 ... 10800.aspx

LPG installer Anglesey North Wales

DIY LPG Kits

07824887160

Freebird
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:12 pm

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#3 Post by Freebird »

Thanks - P38, that's what I meant.

Gilbertd
Senior Member
Posts: 9258
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:00 am
Location: Peterborough

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#4 Post by Gilbertd »

With my 4.0 litre P38 auto I get roughly 15-16mpg on LPG. But that's either lots of short journeys, 80-85mph cruising on motorways or travelling a bit slower but with in excess of 2 tonnes on the hook on the back. Mines on a single point too which tend to be a bit thirstier than a properly set up multipoint.

A P38 manual? You might have difficulty finding one unless someone has swapped the box, virtually all V8s were auto.
96 Saab 900XS, AEB Leo, sold
93 Range Rover 4.2LSE, Lovato LovEco, sold
97 Range Rover 4.0SE, multipoint, sold
98 Ex-Police Range Rover 4.0, AEB Leo, daily motor
96 Range Rover 4.6HSE Ascot, AEB Leo, my spare


Proud member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club.

Freebird
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:12 pm

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#5 Post by Freebird »

Gilbertd wrote:A P38 manual? You might have difficulty finding one unless someone has swapped the box, virtually all V8s were auto.
It's on the 'bay now - I would be interested in your views.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/261192093563? ... _357wt_958

Cheers

Glen.

Gilbertd
Senior Member
Posts: 9258
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:00 am
Location: Peterborough

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#6 Post by Gilbertd »

Well it's not a P38 to start with, it's a soft dash Classic (one of the last of the Classics). 2" lift blocks will make it roll like a supertanker on corners and Insa Turbo tyres are remoulds that are horrendously noisy on the road. If you want to go offroading in it then it's fine but I certainly wouldn't want to use it for motorway journeys......
96 Saab 900XS, AEB Leo, sold
93 Range Rover 4.2LSE, Lovato LovEco, sold
97 Range Rover 4.0SE, multipoint, sold
98 Ex-Police Range Rover 4.0, AEB Leo, daily motor
96 Range Rover 4.6HSE Ascot, AEB Leo, my spare


Proud member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club.

rossko
Installer
Posts: 6393
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 6:51 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#7 Post by rossko »

It's not a "soft dash" model. I think you'd be lucky to get 20mpg and should expect more like 16-18. If you've not driven a classic RR before they can feel alarmingly rolypoly (not a problem, just their nature) and a jacked up one obviously more so.
www.blazegas.com

Freebird
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:12 pm

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#8 Post by Freebird »

Thanks guys - I'll give it miss.

Gilbertd
Senior Member
Posts: 9258
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:00 am
Location: Peterborough

Re: Fuel consumption of P39 3.9 Range rover Manual

#9 Post by Gilbertd »

rossko wrote:It's not a "soft dash" model.
You're absolutely right Ross, not sure what made me think it was a soft dash when I first looked at the picture, the dash is identical to my LSE (except I've still got the cover over the fuses), same colour even.

In all seriousness, a Classic and a P38 are totally different animals to drive. The Classic feels like a proper Land Rover with an upmarket interior, almost truck-like to drive. The P38 feels like a luxury car providing some Philistine hasn't removed the air suspension and fitted coil springs so made it feel more like a Classic.
96 Saab 900XS, AEB Leo, sold
93 Range Rover 4.2LSE, Lovato LovEco, sold
97 Range Rover 4.0SE, multipoint, sold
98 Ex-Police Range Rover 4.0, AEB Leo, daily motor
96 Range Rover 4.6HSE Ascot, AEB Leo, my spare


Proud member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club.

Post Reply