Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

Post Reply
Message
Author
marco
Junior Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:09 am

Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

#1 Post by marco »

Just a thought, if I run my volvo on lpg all the time can I ditch the cat, as it sometimes smells on short runs. I guess it would pass emmisions fine on lpg without a cat but what is the legal position?

junkcatcher
Member
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:54 pm

#2 Post by junkcatcher »

If the car has a down stream lambda sensor it is almost certain to trigger a fault code.
The engine ECU uses the downstream sensor to check if the cat is working.

tommo2009
Intermediate Member
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:31 pm
Location: South Wales
Contact:

#3 Post by tommo2009 »

anything after 1992 (i think) must have a cat regardless of wether it is on LPG or not.

bxman
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:15 am
Location: Malvern Worcs

#4 Post by bxman »

I have been thinking on the same lines particularly as efficiency and hence economy would be improved with a plain pipe in place of the cat wouldn't it ?

marco
Junior Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:09 am

#5 Post by marco »

junkcatcher wrote:If the car has a down stream lambda sensor it is almost certain to trigger a fault code.
The engine ECU uses the downstream sensor to check if the cat is working.
It's only got a sensor 'pre-cat' as it's a earlyish vehicle.

martin rowe
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:03 am

#6 Post by martin rowe »

LPG vehicles do not have a 'catalyst' emission test for MOT, so a cat is not required for MOT.

tommo2009
Intermediate Member
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:31 pm
Location: South Wales
Contact:

#7 Post by tommo2009 »

get in touch with your local MOT station, anything after 1992 must have a cat regardless of wether it is on LPG or not that is the law.

martin rowe
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:03 am

#8 Post by martin rowe »

The fitment of a 'cat' or not is not part of an MOT examination, the only thing is the vehicle has to pass the relivant emission test, whish 1993 on is a cat test, only exception is an LPG equiped vehicle, it has a basic 'non cat' emission test for MOT. take that from an Authorised Examiner, a Nominated Tester & a Quality Controler, oh and MOT staton owner.

marco
Junior Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:09 am

#9 Post by marco »

Thanks Martin, that's very helpful information.
So in theory if you could get the emmissions down a 'non-cat' car could pass the mot, although I guess in practice it's not possible on petrol.

martin rowe
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:03 am

#10 Post by martin rowe »

No an LPG car will not pass 'cat' emissions when running on LPG, but an LPG car dose'nt have a 'cat' emission test for MOT, just the old 'non cat' test ie, CO less than 3.5%, HC less than 1200ppm, and it makes no differance weather its a brand new manefacturer supplies car or a 10 yr old self converted one, just make sure the 'LPG' fuel tab is selected on the MOT computer, the system then tells the MOT tester which type of emission test to perform. This is all because VOSA have not had emission limits developed for LPG vehicles.

martinpluss
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:45 pm

Re: Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

#11 Post by martinpluss »

Do you know where I can find an official vosa document that confirms that an LPG car doesn't have a 'cat' emission test? I'm trying to prove this to my tester... My lpg converted 97 range rover has a cat and he is insisting on doing a cat test...

kevintourer
Junior Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:20 am

Re: Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

#12 Post by kevintourer »

martinpluss wrote:Do you know where I can find an official vosa document that confirms that an LPG car doesn't have a 'cat' emission test? I'm trying to prove this to my tester... My lpg converted 97 range rover has a cat and he is insisting on doing a cat test...
change your mot testing stn, mine always ask which I would like it tested on.

mat_fenwick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:19 am
Location: North Wales

Re:

#13 Post by mat_fenwick »

martin rowe wrote:No an LPG car will not pass 'cat' emissions when running on LPG
I've found that it can in my experience - admittedly just the once but I put a 1994 Discovery V8 through the MOT where the (expensive to replace) cats had been replaced by steel tubes. I explained the situation and they told me the vehicle should be tested on the fuel it was running on when it arrived (in this case LPG) and it passed.

Whether all LPG cars will pass an MOT without a cat fitted is a different question though...
Another member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club

Gilbertd
Senior Member
Posts: 9259
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:00 am
Location: Peterborough

Re: Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

#14 Post by Gilbertd »

Unless there is something wrong with them and the fuelling is incorrect, they all will. If presented for test running on gas, whether cats are fitted or not is irrelevant (the compulsory fitment is a type approval issue, not an MoT testable one) and it will be tested to the appropriate standard. See http://www.motuk.co.uk/images/non_cat.pdf.

The only tests in the MoT regarding the exhaust system, is does it leak, is it secure, is the noise level not excessive? See http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_710.htm
96 Saab 900XS, AEB Leo, sold
93 Range Rover 4.2LSE, Lovato LovEco, sold
97 Range Rover 4.0SE, multipoint, sold
98 Ex-Police Range Rover 4.0, AEB Leo, daily motor
96 Range Rover 4.6HSE Ascot, AEB Leo, my spare


Proud member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club.

pjpj
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1295
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:16 am
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

#15 Post by pjpj »

Just for interests sake, does removing the cat. improve economy any?
And, would the post cat. lambda sensor detect there was no cat. whilst running on LPG? Does running on LPG still produce too much Nitrogen and Nitrogen Oxides etc.
Regards

PJPJ



To help identify your Vauxhall LPG model, go HERE

junkcatcher
Member
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:54 pm

Re: Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

#16 Post by junkcatcher »

Definite Fail

Reasons for failure: Exhaust
a. [b] A part of the system missing [/b] or excessively deteriorated

To me that means the exhaust system must be complete ---- to me that means you can't just throw bits away because you don't like them.
"My friend: There's no safer investment than property in Pompeii."

Gilbertd
Senior Member
Posts: 9259
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:00 am
Location: Peterborough

Re: Is a cat necessary for LPG equiped cars?

#17 Post by Gilbertd »

Junkcatcher, taking your logic any car with a non-standard exhaust of any type would immediately fail as parts are missing (in some cases the whole system). So replacing the tailpipe box with an aftermarket one would be an immediate fail as would replacing it with a straight length of pipe. I think you'll find that unless you get an extremely pedantic tester (and you could appeal the fail anyway and I suspect you would win), parts missing means that the tailpipe has dropped off or similar. Actually checking for the presence of a cat isn't in the test, neither for that matter is checking that it has the same number of silencer boxes that it had when it came out of the factory.
96 Saab 900XS, AEB Leo, sold
93 Range Rover 4.2LSE, Lovato LovEco, sold
97 Range Rover 4.0SE, multipoint, sold
98 Ex-Police Range Rover 4.0, AEB Leo, daily motor
96 Range Rover 4.6HSE Ascot, AEB Leo, my spare


Proud member of the YCHJCYA2PDTHFH club.

Post Reply